AFL news 2022: Referee opposition rule slammed for inconsistency, Bulldogs vs Collingwood score

The AFL’s controversial referee-opposition rule has as soon as once more come beneath fireplace after a number of “ridiculous” choices on Friday night.

The AFL’s controversial referee opposition rule has as soon as once more come beneath scrutiny after a number of “ridiculous” choices through the conflict between the Western Bulldogs and Collingwood at Marvel Stadium Friday night.

This week, AFL soccer boss Brad Scott bragged that referee opposition rule was rapidly turning into “seamless” within the sport, however inconsistent refereeing throughout Friday’s “bullshit” proved in any other case.

Early within the third quarter, the Bulldogs’ junior gunman, Buku Khamis, threw his arms within the air after showing to have been pushed out of a marking contest by Magpies defender Isaac Quaynor.

Watch each blockbuster AFL sport this weekend Reside and Advert Break Free Reside on Kayo. New to Kayo? Strive Now 14 Days Free >

However Khamis’ disappointment grew when the referee awarded Collingwood a 50-metre penalty for referee opposition and gifted the Magpies the third purpose of the sport.

“Khamis cannot imagine it,” Footy icon Brian Taylor mentioned on Channel 7.

“I feel palms up as a result of he did not say something.

“There are arms with a smile. There’s not a lot evil within the query. ”

Richmond marvel Matthew Richardson continued: “Get out of there. Not 50 meters.

“Then it’s important to pay all of it. It is simply ridiculous.”

Former Bulldogs defender Lindsay Gilbee tweeted: “This rule is significantly a joke.

An identical incident occurred within the fourth quarter, when Collingwood ahead Jordan De Goey threw his arms within the air after tackling Josh Dunkley, with solely the Bulldogs given a 50-metre penalty.

A number of soccer specialists identified that De Goey brazenly tried to cover his frustration from the referees, however was nonetheless pinged.

Jon Ralph of the Herald Solar tweeted: “De Goey needed to explode however as an alternative confirmed no actual opposition. Nonetheless 50 meters penalty. We had a baseline. Now it is onerous to know the place we’re once more.”

Australian cricketer Jess Jonassen wrote: I am in favor of defending it, however I am not a fan of the 50 meter ‘opposition’ rule. There’s a distinction between abuse and gamers exhibiting emotion for the time being.”

ABC broadcaster Quentin Hill tweeted: “That is the place this version goes mistaken. De Goey really pays homage by shaking off his response. He will get punished anyway. We get it, however it is time to adapt from over-tuning.”

Talking to Fox Footy, Hawthorn legend Jason Dunstall mentioned: “I believed De Goey specifically was slightly nervous as a result of he was about to exit after which he actually pulled himself again and truly stopped however you might see at first.

“I feel you may have a proper to some latitude if you are going to attempt so onerous to tug your self again.

“That is the place it will get actually, actually onerous.

“They instruct the referees, so let’s not be too harsh on them. In the event you see the arms go up, it is type of opposition, nevertheless it’s onerous to count on the gamers to fully flip off the emotion as quickly because the whistle blows.”

Back1 of 2

Leave a Comment